AIC Update
February 2005 | Volume # 2 | Number # 5
 a catalyst for change through dialogue and understanding

In This Issue


Talking Points:
  • Diplomacy and Dialogue

    AIC Press Releases & Alerts:
  • Democratization Without US Relations Impossible!
  • Cordially invited to “Tribal Life and Women’s Rights in Iran
  • Meet the Author: Christopher de Bellaigue @ Asia Society

    Perspectives & Commentary:
  • US-Iran Relations: Is Confrontation Necessary? (Part 1)

    Excerpts - "The change in US-Iran relations is particularly called for since they are harmful to the national interests of both sides."

    "Three such schemes are possible: “soft peace”, “hard war” and a combination thereof, where the former guarantees the successful implementation of the latter."

    "It will entail massive death and destruction. Iran is no Afghanistan or even Iraq: a historical country with 72 million largely nationalist people and a territory five times the size of France, Iran cannot be easily defeated or its nativist regime quickly overthrown."

  • Capitals a World Apart?
    (top) Vanak Sq., Tehran, Iran, Sunday, January 23, 2005 Tehran24.com
    (bottom) Connecticut Avenue, Washington D.C. Sunday, January 23, 2005. Washington Post
    Snow



    The American Iranian Council (AIC) is a nonprofit and nonpartisan tax-exempt [501 (C) 3] educational organization dedicated to improved US-Iran relations through dialogue, better understanding, and constructive engagement.

    American Iranian Council
    20 Nassau Street, Suite 111 | Princeton, NJ 08542
    tel: 609.252.9099 | fax:609.252.9698
    www.american-iranian.org
    aic@american-iranian.org | update@american-iranian.org

    Talking Points:

    Each week the Council publishes Talking Points in AIC UPDATE to improve dialogue on issues integral to improving US-Iran relations.

    Diplomacy and Dialogue


    Despite tough talk and street gossip suggesting regime change, both the United States and Iran remain on a dangerous but peaceful path towards rapprochement. Although the relationship is marred by a history of mistrust, neither regime change, nor war is the official policy of either administration. Top officials from both countries regard dialogue and discussion as the primary source for improved relations and the main mechanism for promoting nonproliferation.

  • With regards to Iran’s nuclear program, the United States has a number of diplomatic options still on the table, even if it remains at a distance from the European negotiations. The option of reporting Iran to the UN Security Council still exists, as does engagement with Russia and China, both of whom have the ability to delay Iran’s enrichment of uranium and development of weapons.

  • Hassan Rowhani, Iran's top national security adviser and the nation's chief negotiator on the nuclear issue, "would like to have a suitable atmosphere for both sides to move to a better place" after so many years of estrangement. "If the United States is after solving the (nuclear) problem, definitely there would be a way (to improve relations).” Rowhani also suggested that the basis for dialogue needed to be redefined.

  • New US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says diplomacy can resolve the Iranian nuclear crisis, but verification is the key issue. Senator Joseph Biden was quoted, saying that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was receptive to his "initiatives to reach out to the Iranians for discussions" in her earlier capacity as National Security Advisor. Despite her firm stance, Rice has explicitly suggested that diplomacy is the correct option for dealing with Iran’s nuclear program and other outstanding issues between the two countries.


    AIC Press Releases & Alerts:

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    February 3, 2005

    Democratization Without US Relations Impossible!

    PRINCETON, NJ, February 3, 2005 – Hooshang Amirahmadi, Ph.D., President of the American Iranian Council and Director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University presented a compelling case for engagement, suggesting that normalization of relations with the United States is a “necessary condition for democratization.” The lecture, entitled “The Role of the United States in the Iranian Transition to Democracy,” was held at Columbia University on February 2, 2005.

    Amirahmadi focused on the minimum conditions required for Iran to become a fully democratized state. “Iran cannot be democratized before US-Iran relations are normalized,” said Amirahmadi in his address. However, Amirahamadi proceeded to explain that normalization was not a sufficient condition. “The reformation of Islam, diversification of the petroleum economy, and the formation of a coalition government” are also necessary.

    Amirahmadi concluded his presentation by emphasizing that “anyone who is interested in democracy in Iran must get organized and help normalize US-Iran relations.” Dr. Amirahmadi offered the American Iranian Council as a platform for participation.

    Commenting on Amirahmadi’s lecture, the American Iranian Council’s Executive Director, Adam Yeeles, said: “Amirahmadi’s proposition that no country has become democratic in the absence of diplomatic relations with the United States is eye-opening and requires serious examination, considering the US commitment to democratization around the globe.”

    The American Iranian Council (AIC) is a nonprofit and nonpartisan tax-exempt [501 (C) 3] educational organization dedicated to improved US-Iran relations through dialogue, better understanding, and constructive engagement.

    ###

    Dear Friend of AIC:

    You are cordially invited to “Tribal Life and Women’s Rights in Iran” on Saturday, February 26, 2005, from 6:00 to 10 p.m. at the Livingston College Student Center, Rutgers University. The event is organized by the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University, and is co-sponsored by the American Iranian Council, among other organizations. Attached flyer and registration form provide detailed information.

    This event will feature:

  • A keynote speech by the renowned Iranian human rights activist Mehrangiz Kar
  • A presentation on tribal women and their education by Dr. Cima Sedigh
  • Tribal Music by Chakavak Ensemble


    Location of the event:

    Rutgers University Livingston College Student Center
    84 Joyce Kilmer Ave
    Piscataway, NJ 08854-8040

    For directions refer to the following website:
    http://maps.rutgers.edu/directions.aspx?id=198

    For more information contact: (732) 445-8444

    Space is limited; please Email mideast@rci.rutgers.edu to sign up and reserve your seat by February 17. In your email, please include your name, phone number, and an email address.

    We hope that you will grace this event with your presence.

    Sincerely,

    Hooshang Amirahmadi, Ph.D.
    Professor and Director
    Center for Middle Eastern Studies
    President, AIC


    Traditional Persian Dinner will be served.

    Co-sponsors:
    American Iranian Council
    Rutgers Center for Women’s Global Leadership
    Rutgers Department of African Studies
    Rutgers University Persian Cultural Club

    Asia Society

    presents

    Meet the Author: Christopher de Bellaigue

    In the Rose Garden of the Martyrs: A Memoir of Iran

    Wednesday, February 16 at 6:30 pm

    Rich in history and myth, and a key player in contemporary world politics, Iran remains an enigmatic society for Americans. Journalist de Bellaigue (The Economist, The New York Review of Books) takes a critical look at the social and political conditions in Iran since the 1979 Revolution through the voices of Mullahs, academics, artists, traders, mystics, ageing revolutionary guards, and young feminists. Book signing and reception follows.

    $5 students; $7 members; $12 nonmembers Asia Society,
    725 Park Avenue at 70th Street, New York, NY 10021
    Call 212 517-ASIA. Visit www.asiasociety.org


    Perspectives & Commentary:

    The following essay was originally written by Hooshang Amirahmadi in 2002 following President George W. Bush’s State of the Union speech that characterized Iran as a member of the ‘axis of evil’. However, the ideas are as pertinent today as they were three years ago. The essay has been slightly adapted and updated to reflect current events.

    US-Iran Relations: Is Confrontation Necessary? (Part 1)


    Despite President George W. Bush’s call for freedom in his second inaugural address, US-Iran relations have made a dangerous turn toward confrontation. The President’s assertion that it is “the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world” is a welcome reprieve for an Iranian people with a nascent democratic movement edging towards victory. However, the President also refuses to take the confrontational approach off the table, continually urging that it might become necessary to eliminate the threats of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction that originate from Iran. While I disagree with Mr. Bush’s continued characterization of Iran as a member of the ‘axis of evil’ and his confrontational approach, I do share his sense of urgency to change the current state of US-Iran relations.

    The relations between the two countries have been unfriendly for over two decades, and inimical relations produce inimical behavior and deeds. Under this condition, complaints, rhetoric, warnings, and soft policies are no remedies and the best approach is to transform the status quo. The change in US-Iran relations is particularly called for since they are harmful to the national interests of both sides. Assuming that the United States has no immediate military plan to overthrow the regime in Tehran, the question is how to change the relations for the better while promoting political reform and economic development in Iran.

    Iran’s past attempts to challenge the United States or mend relations with it through the use of trade or economic relations, cultural exchanges, and cover-up diplomacy, a la Iran-Contra fiasco, have all failed. Similarly, the US experience in punishing Iran though economic sanctions or engaging Iran through piecemeal incentives and passive invitation to dialogue has proven ineffective. In a situation where political and strategic concerns predominate and mutual distrust is built into a complex web of bilateral and regional problems, a more resolute and purposeful scheme is needed.

    Three such schemes are possible: “soft peace”, “hard war” and a combination thereof, where the former guarantees the successful implementation of the latter. Iran may wish to continue with its current “no war, no peace” policy toward the United States, but this approach does not serve the interests of either parties or the Iranian people. This “dead-end” scheme must be rejected, and it is to the credit of President Bush to have done so in his second Inaugural speech. In the age of globalization, non-alignment and inaction is hardly an option and will be sooner or later rejected by the Iranian people, should the Islamic government fail to do so first.

    Although “diplomacy” is the official position of the Administration, the “hard war” approach to Iran seems to underlie President Bush’s Inaugural address and the rhetoric that followed. Whether this approach is necessary or even suitable to the prevailing condition is debatable. While it might be used to effectively enforce a “soft peace,” the approach, in isolation, can be most counterproductive and harmful to the national interests of the United States. At the very least, it will entail massive death and destruction. Iran is no Afghanistan or even Iraq: a historical country with 72 million largely nationalist people and a territory five times the size of France, Iran cannot be easily defeated or its nativist regime quickly overthrown.

  • About Update
    AIC Update is a public service of the American Iranian Council aimed at educating Americans, including Iranian-Americans, about US-Iran relations. AIC Update is an information resource for US-Iran relations and the efforts of the American Iranian Council to perpetuate meaningful dialogue between the United States and Iran.
    Vision
    The vision of the American Iranian Council is that the United States and Iran will work together, since their common interests far outweigh their differences. AIC also envisions the Iranian-American community playing an increasingly significant role in American society, and Iran becoming a democratically developed member of the global community with full respect for human rights.
    Mission
    The mission of AIC is to be a constructive force, in cooperation and partnership with other organizations, in bringing the United States and Iran together, involving the Iranian-American community in the dialogue, and bringing attention to social and political conditions in Iran.
    Copyright © 2004 American Iranian Council. All rights reserved.
    Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us

    To unsubscribe please send an email with 'unsubscribe' in the subject line to
    unsubscribe@american-iranian.org